Other Posts from Google+

10Feb2016

Title: (Part One) 1% and 99% - what I saw in my publication process

Recently, I have been often asked about

- the post on Google+ (31Aug2015) and Google+ Page (31Aug2015) and

- the description of my book on Amazon.

It’s very hard to reply to questions every time with the same answer. So, I tell the people a series of events below to explain the background of the ructions.

1. BlueInk Review (original)

2. My Response

To me, the review above was nothing but the sleazy homework of a student. I even paid £749 with some discount through Xlibris (the publisher) to the BlueInk Review. So, I sent the mail below through Xlibris to the BlueInk Review.

3. Reply from the BlueInk Review

Two weeks later, the BlueInk Review sent me the reply below

and the revised review below with a morsel of fixes.

4. My Response

The defence argument of the BlueInk Review was brazen and disingenuous. I sent the mail below.

5. BlueInk Review (final)

Those are a series of events, until I posted the review below on Amazon.

6. Lessons I learned

When I started the publication process, I had an expectation that the people in the publishing industry would behave voluntarily according to the higher ethical standard than any other industry. However, they have turned out the cohort to capitalize on the weakness of the self-publishing/first-time writers.

When I encounter malpractices in the financial sector, I can bring the issue to NFA, CFTC, SEC, etc. When it comes to the disingenuous behavior committed by the publishing industry, I should take everything for granted. No place to appeal the complaint to.

Bernie Sanders always pounces on the Wall Street and the 1%, zeroing in on unscrupulousness and inequity. What I leaned from the publication process is the wretches also exist within the publishing industry and the 99%. We’d rather not blot out the good in the 1% and the bad in the 99%.

Some people might think I am exaggerating and over-generalizing my personal issue. I have one more story to have in my mind. They would agree with me, when I tell it some day.

Other Posts from Google+

10Feb2016

Title: (Part One) 1% and 99% - what I saw in my publication process

Recently, I have been often asked about

- the post on Google+ (31Aug2015) and Google+ Page (31Aug2015) and

- the description of my book on Amazon.

It’s very hard to reply to questions every time with the same answer. So, I tell the people a series of events below to explain the background of the ructions.

1. BlueInk Review (original)

2. My Response

To me, the review above was nothing but the sleazy homework of a student. I even paid £749 with some discount through Xlibris (the publisher) to the BlueInk Review. So, I sent the mail below through Xlibris to the BlueInk Review.

3. Reply from the BlueInk Review

Two weeks later, the BlueInk Review sent me the reply below

and the revised review below with a morsel of fixes.

4. My Response

The defence argument of the BlueInk Review was brazen and disingenuous. I sent the mail below.

5. BlueInk Review (final)

Those are a series of events, until I posted the review below on Amazon.

6. Lessons I learned

When I started the publication process, I had an expectation that the people in the publishing industry would behave voluntarily according to the higher ethical standard than any other industry. However, they have turned out the cohort to capitalize on the weakness of the self-publishing/first-time writers.

When I encounter malpractices in the financial sector, I can bring the issue to NFA, CFTC, SEC, etc. When it comes to the disingenuous behavior committed by the publishing industry, I should take everything for granted. No place to appeal the complaint to.

Bernie Sanders always pounces on the Wall Street and the 1%, zeroing in on unscrupulousness and inequity. What I leaned from the publication process is the wretches also exist within the publishing industry and the 99%. We’d rather not blot out the good in the 1% and the bad in the 99%.

Some people might think I am exaggerating and over-generalizing my personal issue. I have one more story to have in my mind. They would agree with me, when I tell it some day.

Other Posts from Google+

10Feb2016

Title: (Part One) 1% and 99% - what I saw in my publication process

Recently, I have been often asked about

- the post on Google+ (31Aug2015) and Google+ Page (31Aug2015) and

- the description of my book on Amazon.

It’s very hard to reply to questions every time with the same answer. So, I tell the people a series of events below to explain the background of the ructions.

1. BlueInk Review (original)

2. My Response

To me, the review above was nothing but the sleazy homework of a student. I even paid £749 with some discount through Xlibris (the publisher) to the BlueInk Review. So, I sent the mail below through Xlibris to the BlueInk Review.

3. Reply from the BlueInk Review

Two weeks later, the BlueInk Review sent me the reply below

and the revised review below with a morsel of fixes.

4. My Response

The defence argument of the BlueInk Review was brazen and disingenuous. I sent the mail below.

5. BlueInk Review (final)

Those are a series of events, until I posted the review below on Amazon.

6. Lessons I learned

When I started the publication process, I had an expectation that the people in the publishing industry would behave voluntarily according to the higher ethical standard than any other industry. However, they have turned out the cohort to capitalize on the weakness of the self-publishing/first-time writers.

When I encounter malpractices in the financial sector, I can bring the issue to NFA, CFTC, SEC, etc. When it comes to the disingenuous behavior committed by the publishing industry, I should take everything for granted. No place to appeal the complaint to.

Bernie Sanders always pounces on the Wall Street and the 1%, zeroing in on unscrupulousness and inequity. What I leaned from the publication process is the wretches also exist within the publishing industry and the 99%. We’d rather not blot out the good in the 1% and the bad in the 99%.

Some people might think I am exaggerating and over-generalizing my personal issue. I have one more story to have in my mind. They would agree with me, when I tell it some day.